PC-BSD review
Intro
I am a newbie. There is no doubt about that. In the windows world, I know more than average. But when it comes to linux or BSD, I’m still in the first stages of getting my feet wet. I once used a linux distro (some version of Suse) for about 1 month without booting into Windows. But then things broke, productivity was lost, and I decided to go back.
For me, a computer needs to work in the first place. In my free time I can tinker with it. I hate it when it goes the other way: needing to tinker with it in order to be able to work with it. And so far my experience is just that: sooner or later it will brake, or I don’t have the time to delve into the manuals to get something to work. Since I’m no fan of Microsoft I keep on looking for replacements of Windows OS.
My last, and best, experience was with Ubuntu. To be honest, it was a fairly good experience. It almost replaced my Windows. Until I broke it getting to try to get some compiler to work and couldn’t build something I wanted. There’s no doubt this could have been fixed if I wanted to, but at that time it was easier to boot into windows so I could continue working, and look at the problem later. But that later didn’t came as I then decided to try Suse 10.0.
My biggest concern with linux are its package managers. My first experience was with RPM on Suse. However, it didn’t take long to experience the problem of dependency hell. Ubuntu’s apt-get is a big improvement for me. Although easy and convenient, a lay user like me got lost in what package exactly I needed to install to get the compiler installed.
So in the end I wondered if linux really was for ordinary users. Users that will devote some time to learn their system, but in order to do interesting things with it, not only in order to solve problems or make things work.
Enter PC-BSD
Enter distrowatch. I like to check it often to keep up with new developments. The last thing that cought my eye was an announcement of release candidate 2 of PC-BSD version 1. I remembered something about it being user-friendly, so I checked out the website. I was thrilled.
Not just because it had kde 3.5, which I was eager to check out, but because it had a revolutionary package system: the PC-BSD package manager using .pbi packages.. What’s so nice about it is that it seems to be developed for people like me. I don’t have to wade through filenames and hope I pick the right one for installation, or be afraid that the system will break. I just download one file and install it just the way it’s done in Windows. The package has all it depends on and installs graphically with an easy dialog.
There seems to be some discussions going on as to whether this is safe or not. I can’t give an opinion about this. I’ll let the experts fight it out. Probably it will be fought out in practice if the system becomes more popular. And becoming more popular is what I hope it will do because for now there aren’t a whole lot of packages available. Things will only improve, I’m sure.
May I suggest Kororaa to you? It is a Gentoo based distro. it has an incredible amount of available software (22.000+). Which can as easily be installed as apt-get trough the kuroo installer. I consider myself still a newbie but Kororoaa is the one that helped me to learn linux.
More info:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=kororaa
http://kororaa.org/
Comment by HXC — January 26, 2006 @ 3:36 pm
Hey HXC,
Thanks for the comment. I’ll surely take a closer look at it.
Comment by dissurion — January 26, 2006 @ 4:17 pm
You might want to try Kanotix. You can test drive
it from the cd drive as its a live distro. Of course
you only really see it in action when its on the hard drive…
After slackware, debian, mandriva, ubuntu, kubuntu, gentoo, fedora and vector, I have settled on this one. (Though of course I’m bound to try a few
others).
I run a dual boot: Freebsd and Kanotix. Freebsd is
an absolute cracker of a system, but it takes work to make it behave… In Linux I was looking for something that just worked, wanting a fullyautomatic system next to my freebsd (something that would help get the wife interested in life beyond windows), and figuring that with all the desktop development going on, there should be something usable out there.
Anyway, the wife still uses windows on her machine, but I have hopes for my daughter with Kanotix…
Comment by pparada — January 27, 2006 @ 3:59 am
What about Xandros? It is almost too close to windows, but the business version with crossover office is slick.
Comment by kevwit — January 27, 2006 @ 8:17 pm
By the way to change conf. files you don’t need to log in as root simply go to menu and choose run and after type kdesu i believe is like this name of editor vi or another one and the path to the file after pwd and that’s it.. cheers i tested pc-bsd from 0.7 beta till now mixed with a lot of linux distros
Comment by Duarte — January 30, 2006 @ 6:04 am
I’m a real big fan of PC-BSD’s lesser known cousin, DesktopBSD. It’s an easy to run desktop, but you don’t have the problems introduced by running .pbi’s. Instead, it uses a synaptic-like front-end to ports. Every file is built from source, so no conflicts with .pbi’s, and no messing around with command line syntax to install packages.
In the end, however, I find that FreeBSD and it’s derivatives just don’t have the hardware compatibility that I need, so I stick with debian derivatives and suse.
Comment by Morgan — February 3, 2006 @ 2:02 am
Nice review, very windows centric. But that’s not a problem since I’m a windows junkie. I love to use windows, but always eager to try other system. PCBSD is one of my favorites like debian or slack
Comment by dwilicious — February 3, 2006 @ 8:54 am