PC-BSD review
KDE 3.5
I have seen KDE 3.5 only from screenshots taken from kubuntu on some site. I don’t know what a default KDE 3.5 installation looks like so I can’t comment on that. Some alteration are obvious ofcourse.
[you'll have to look at osdir for a screenshot of this, since I couldn't get one transferred to my windows machine]
There’s the PC-BSD wallpaper, and the PC-BSD menu graphic. A bigger change from other distros such as kubuntu and Suse is probably the KDE menu.
[another screenhost from osdir]
Notice how there’s a separation: KDE programs versus other programs. I sort of like this. I don’t care how my programs are not grouped together. I’m used to this on Windows and have never had any trouble finding a program.If I had to choose, I’d prefer to have my installed programs together like in PC-BSD. But that’s probably just personal bias and some will prefer it the other way, with a default grouping of programs.
There aren’t much programs installed by default, which I find a nice thing. After all, I’ll download the ones I would like to have and install them. But like in the above mentioned case, for some this will be a turn-off as they would like the system to be ready with the latest version of some packages (OpenOffice.org for example). From a user choice perspective, I prefer the way it is now: a base system (maybe even too much programs installed already) and I will do the rest according to my wishes.
What I didn’t like
There are some things I think that can be improved upon. Remember, as I don’t have much experience with all of this, it may be something that PC-BSD is not responsible for.
-I didn’t notice an update check for Firefox.
-The PC-BSD options in the KDE menu could have been organized better. There were “settings” in the KDE-programs submenu and under “action” in the main menu, both with same icon but with different things to set. These could have been integrated or so.
-My floppydrive and cd-rom were unmountable. I also failed as root. Probably easy if you know how, but not interesting if you want a ready machine.
-I didn’t found a resolution greater than 1024×786 to be set, meaning I would have to go into configuration files.
-I would prefer if there was an uninstall option in the programs menu of the particular program instead of having to go to the “uninstall manager”.
-I would like to see an option where to install a certain package during installation. But I know I know nothing about installing packages on linux or bsd, so don’t know how reasonable that is.
-The bootsplash: either none or keep it up to the point where KDE starts loading.
-After enabling root login in KDE and trying to switch to root (I know, I know) KDE failed to let me log in and hanged when there was a floppy and cd-rom in the drives. At that point, I only knew how to reboot. After removing the floppy and cd-rom I could login.
Except for the floppydrive problem and the resolution these things aren’t really annoying for a lay user like me. Since I believe PC-BSD was made for lay users too, maybe these two things could be improved upon.
May I suggest Kororaa to you? It is a Gentoo based distro. it has an incredible amount of available software (22.000+). Which can as easily be installed as apt-get trough the kuroo installer. I consider myself still a newbie but Kororoaa is the one that helped me to learn linux.
More info:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=kororaa
http://kororaa.org/
Comment by HXC — January 26, 2006 @ 3:36 pm
Hey HXC,
Thanks for the comment. I’ll surely take a closer look at it.
Comment by dissurion — January 26, 2006 @ 4:17 pm
You might want to try Kanotix. You can test drive
it from the cd drive as its a live distro. Of course
you only really see it in action when its on the hard drive…
After slackware, debian, mandriva, ubuntu, kubuntu, gentoo, fedora and vector, I have settled on this one. (Though of course I’m bound to try a few
others).
I run a dual boot: Freebsd and Kanotix. Freebsd is
an absolute cracker of a system, but it takes work to make it behave… In Linux I was looking for something that just worked, wanting a fullyautomatic system next to my freebsd (something that would help get the wife interested in life beyond windows), and figuring that with all the desktop development going on, there should be something usable out there.
Anyway, the wife still uses windows on her machine, but I have hopes for my daughter with Kanotix…
Comment by pparada — January 27, 2006 @ 3:59 am
What about Xandros? It is almost too close to windows, but the business version with crossover office is slick.
Comment by kevwit — January 27, 2006 @ 8:17 pm
By the way to change conf. files you don’t need to log in as root simply go to menu and choose run and after type kdesu i believe is like this name of editor vi or another one and the path to the file after pwd and that’s it.. cheers i tested pc-bsd from 0.7 beta till now mixed with a lot of linux distros
Comment by Duarte — January 30, 2006 @ 6:04 am
I’m a real big fan of PC-BSD’s lesser known cousin, DesktopBSD. It’s an easy to run desktop, but you don’t have the problems introduced by running .pbi’s. Instead, it uses a synaptic-like front-end to ports. Every file is built from source, so no conflicts with .pbi’s, and no messing around with command line syntax to install packages.
In the end, however, I find that FreeBSD and it’s derivatives just don’t have the hardware compatibility that I need, so I stick with debian derivatives and suse.
Comment by Morgan — February 3, 2006 @ 2:02 am
Nice review, very windows centric. But that’s not a problem since I’m a windows junkie. I love to use windows, but always eager to try other system. PCBSD is one of my favorites like debian or slack
Comment by dwilicious — February 3, 2006 @ 8:54 am